In an unprecedented legal move, a Texas man has filed a lawsuit against three women for allegedly helping his ex-wife obtain abortion medication, marking the first such case since the state’s near-total ban on abortion last year.
Marcus Silva, represented by former Texas solicitor general Jonathan Mitchell and state Rep. Briscoe Cain (R-Deer Park), is seeking $1 million in damages under the state’s wrongful death statute.
Lawsuit Relies on Text Messages as Evidence
The lawsuit heavily relies on text messages between Silva’s ex-wife and the three women, who allegedly provided her with information about Aid Access, an international group that provides abortion medication by mail.
The messages reveal that Silva’s ex-wife was concerned he would try to prevent her from terminating the pregnancy if he found out. One of the women is accused of delivering the abortion pills to Silva’s ex-wife.
The lawsuit also alleges a conspiracy charge against the women for advising Silva’s ex-wife to conceal the pregnancy and their communications from him.
Legality of Abortion in Texas Remains Murky
The legal status of abortion in Texas at the time of the alleged incident in July 2022 remains unclear. While Texas’ trigger law banning abortion did not take effect until August, some conservative leaders claimed that pre-Roe abortion bans were reinstated when Roe v. Wade was overturned in June.
Texas law currently prohibits abortion in most circumstances, with the pregnant person exempt from prosecution. Anyone who assists in an abortion, however, could potentially face civil and criminal penalties.
Implications for Abortion Rights and Access
This case highlights the ongoing battle over abortion rights in Texas and across the United States following the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade.
As states grapple with implementing new restrictions or protections, cases like Silva’s could have far-reaching implications for those seeking or providing abortion care.
Abortion rights advocates argue that such lawsuits will create a chilling effect, deterring people from helping friends or family members access abortion for fear of legal repercussions.
“This is going to cause such fear and chilling that it doesn’t matter whether [Mitchell] is right,” said Joanna Grossman, a law professor at SMU Dedman School of Law.
Others, like Charles “Rocky” Rhodes, a professor at South Texas College of Law, suggest the case could potentially have merit under Texas’ current abortion laws.
It’s scary to think that you can be sued for significant damages for helping a friend undertake acts that help her have an abortion, he said.
Ongoing Legal Battles and Uncertainties
Silva’s lawsuit is just one of many legal challenges surrounding abortion access in Texas. The state Supreme Court is currently considering another case, Zurawski v State of Texas, which could clarify the scope of medical exceptions to the state’s abortion ban.
In the meantime, pregnant Texans and their healthcare providers navigate a landscape of uncertainty, with some forced to travel out of state for care and others denied abortions even in life-threatening situations.
As the legal battle over abortion rights continues to unfold, cases like Silva’s serve as a stark reminder of the high stakes involved for individuals on both sides of this deeply divisive issue.
Check Also: Catastrophic Flooding Triggers Mandatory Evacuations in Southeast Texas
